
By, Luuk L. Westerhof, MSc
Abstract
Relational hunger represents a fundamental human phenomenon arising when our innate drive for connection and belonging remains unfulfilled during critical developmental periods. This comprehensive review synthesizes research from attachment theory, developmental neuroscience, trauma studies, and somatic psychology to provide a scientific framework for understanding how early relational experiences shape lifelong patterns of connection and disconnection. Drawing on pioneering work by researchers such as John Cacioppo, Allan Schore, Stephen Porges, and Bessel van der Kolk, this article examines the neurobiological foundations of relational hunger, its manifestations in adult relationships, and evidence-based approaches to healing. The integration of mind-body perspectives reveals that relational hunger is not merely a psychological phenomenon, but rather involves complex interactions between nervous system development, embodied memory, and attachment patterns that persist throughout the lifespan.
Introduction
In an age of unprecedented technological connectivity, paradoxically, rates of loneliness, depression, and relational difficulties continue to climb. While social media platforms promise connection, many individuals report feeling more isolated than ever, surrounded by hundreds of online "friends" yet profoundly alone. This phenomenon highlights a deeper issue that extends beyond mere social contact: the quality and authenticity of our connections matter far more than their quantity.
Relational hunger represents one of the most fundamental yet underrecognized aspects of human psychology—a deep, persistent longing for authentic connection that can persist even when surrounded by caring others. Unlike physical hunger, which can be satisfied through consumption, relational hunger requires specific psychological and emotional nutrients that must be consistently present in relationships over time. Understanding this phenomenon requires integrating insights from multiple disciplines, including attachment theory, developmental neuroscience, trauma research, and somatic psychology.
This article presents a comprehensive scientific framework for understanding relational hunger, including its developmental origins, neurobiological mechanisms, manifestations in adult relationships, and pathways toward healing. By examining how our earliest relational experiences literally shape the architecture of our brains and nervous systems, we can gain a deeper understanding of why some individuals struggle with persistent feelings of emptiness and disconnection, despite their best efforts to form meaningful relationships.
The Neurobiological Foundation of Connection
Relational hunger emerges from a fundamental truth about human development: we are born to be in relationship. Contemporary research on social baseline theory demonstrates that humans are biologically wired for connection, with the presence of trusted others literally regulating our nervous system and reducing the metabolic cost of emotional and physiological regulation (Beckes & Coan, 2011). This research validates that humans are not designed to navigate life's challenges in isolation but require the co-regulatory presence of attuned others for optimal functioning.
John Cacioppo's pioneering research on loneliness reveals that humans have a biological need for social connection as essential as our need for food, water, and shelter (Cacioppo & Patrick, 2008). His longitudinal studies demonstrated that chronic loneliness activates the same neural pathways as physical pain, triggering stress responses that can lead to inflammatory processes, compromised immune function, and increased mortality risk comparable to obesity or smoking (Cacioppo & Hawkley, 2009; Holt-Lunstad et al., 2010).
Neurobiological research supports the fundamental nature of this need. Mirror neuron studies by Rizzolatti and Craighero (2004) demonstrate that the human brain is wired for connection, with specialized neural circuits that activate both when we perform actions and when we observe others performing the same actions. This neurological foundation suggests that social connection is not merely psychologically beneficial but represents a core biological imperative.
Additionally, neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that social rejection activates the anterior cingulate cortex and the right ventral prefrontal cortex—the same brain regions involved in processing physical pain (Eisenberger et al., 2003). This neurobiological overlap helps explain why relationship wounds can feel as devastating as physical injuries and why the absence of connection can create such profound suffering.
When this fundamental need remains unmet over extended periods, particularly during critical developmental windows in infancy and early childhood, it creates lasting neurobiological changes that manifest as persistent relational hunger throughout life (Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000). The developing brain's stress response systems become dysregulated when attachment needs are not met, leading to alterations in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis that can persist into adulthood (Gunnar & Quevedo, 2007).
Research on adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) by Felitti et al. (1998) demonstrates that early relational trauma and neglect create lasting physiological changes, increasing susceptibility to depression, anxiety, substance abuse, and physical health problems decades later. The developing nervous system, designed to expect consistent care and attunement, must adapt to environments where such care is absent or inconsistent, creating the neurobiological foundations for lifelong relational hunger.
The Nature of Relational vs. Physical Hunger
Relational hunger fundamentally differs from physical hunger in several critical ways that illuminate why this psychological need is so persistent and difficult to satisfy. Physical hunger operates through clear, measurable physiological signals—blood glucose levels drop, ghrelin is released from the stomach, and the hypothalamus triggers conscious awareness of the need for food (Woods et al., 1998). This hunger follows predictable patterns: it builds gradually, peaks at mealtimes, and can be reliably satisfied through consumption. Once adequate nutrition is consumed, satiety hormones like leptin signal the brain that the need has been met, and the hunger subsides for hours.
In stark contrast, relational hunger operates through complex psychological and neurobiological mechanisms that resist simple satisfaction. Rather than depending on consumable resources, relational hunger requires specific interpersonal qualities that must be consistently present in relationships over time. These qualities include emotional attunement, consistent availability, authentic presence, and the capacity to be genuinely seen and understood for one's true self (Stern, 1985). Unlike food, these psychological nutrients cannot be stockpiled or consumed in bulk; they must be continuously renewed through ongoing relational experiences.
The Four Essential Components of Relational Nourishment
Emotional Attunement represents perhaps the most crucial element of relational nourishment. Stern's groundbreaking research on infant-caregiver interactions reveals that emotional attunement—the caregiver's ability to resonate with and respond appropriately to the infant's internal emotional states—forms the foundation for all future psychological development (Stern, 1985). This process involves what Stern terms "affect attunement," where the caregiver not only recognizes the infant's emotional state but mirrors it back in a way that communicates understanding and validation.
This attunement process is neurobiologically complex, involving the caregiver's ability to read micro-expressions, vocal tones, body language, and behavioral cues, then respond in ways that help the infant feel understood and regulated (Tronick, 2007). Research on still-face experiments demonstrates that when caregivers fail to provide this attunement—even temporarily—infants show immediate distress, increased cortisol levels, and attempts to re-engage the caregiver (Tronick et al., 1978). This research reveals that emotional attunement is not merely comforting but essential for the development of emotional regulation, self-awareness, and the capacity for intimate relationships.
Consistent Availability refers to the reliable physical and emotional presence of caring others during times of need. Unlike physical hunger, which can be satisfied through scheduled meals, relational hunger requires the security of knowing that connection will be available when needed. Bowlby's attachment theory emphasizes that children need a "secure base"—a consistently available caregiver who provides safety and comfort, particularly during times of stress or exploration (Bowlby, 1988).
Research on maternal sensitivity by Ainsworth et al. (1978) demonstrates that consistent availability involves not just being physically present but being emotionally attuned and responsive to the child's cues. Inconsistent availability—such as a caregiver who is sometimes nurturing but other times emotionally unavailable, rejecting, or overwhelmed—creates what attachment researchers call "anxious attachment," characterized by hypervigilance to relationship threats and difficulty trusting in others' reliability.
Authentic Presence involves the quality of being genuinely engaged and emotionally real in relationships, rather than performing roles or maintaining facades. This authenticity requires caregivers to be in touch with their own emotional states while remaining regulated enough to attend to the child's needs. Research by Fonagy et al. (2002) on mentalization—the capacity to understand behavior in terms of underlying mental states—shows that children develop secure attachment when caregivers can authentically reflect on both their own and their child's internal experiences.
The Capacity to be Genuinely Seen and Understood represents the culmination of relational nourishment—the experience of having one's authentic self-recognized, valued, and accepted by another. This goes beyond surface-level recognition of behaviors or achievements to encompass what Rogers (1961) termed "unconditional positive regard"—the experience of being valued for one's essential being rather than for performance or compliance.
The Persistence of Unmet Relational Hunger
When these essential components are missing during critical developmental periods, the resulting relational hunger creates what attachment researchers describe as "internal working models"—unconscious templates for how relationships function that guide expectations and behavior in future relationships (Bowlby, 1969). These models become deeply ingrained in neural pathways and continue to influence relationship patterns throughout life.
This creates a profound paradox: even when surrounded by many people, the underlying hunger for authentic connection persists regardless of the quantity of social interactions. The person experiences what many describe as feeling "alone in a crowd"—a profound sense of being unseen and misunderstood that creates an internal void that cannot be filled through superficial social contact.
Research on social support distinguishes between "enacted support" (actual helpful behaviors from others) and "perceived support" (the subjective sense of being cared for and understood), with perceived support showing stronger relationships to psychological well-being (Haber et al., 2007). This research highlights why the quantity of social contact cannot substitute for the quality of connection—without the specific psychological nutrients of attunement, availability, authenticity, and genuine recognition, even well-intentioned social interactions may leave the core hunger unaddressed.
The Developmental Origins of Relational Hunger
The Social Brain: Designed for Connection
The seeds of relational hunger are planted in the earliest months and years of life, during what neuroscientists refer to as the "critical period" of brain development, when the developing infant's nervous system learns to regulate itself through relationships (Porges, 2011). This process, known as "co-regulation," represents one of the most fundamental aspects of human development: we learn how to be human through our earliest relational experiences.
Dr. Bruce Perry's groundbreaking research on early brain development reveals that the infant brain is exquisitely designed to develop in the context of nurturing relationships, with neural pathways forming based on the quality and consistency of early caregiving experiences (Perry & Szalavitz, 2017). Unlike other mammals, whose brains are more fully developed at birth, human infants arrive with what neuroscientists call "experience-expectant" brains—neural systems that expect specific types of relational experiences to develop correctly.
The human brain at birth contains approximately 100 billion neurons but relatively few connections between them. During the first three years of life, the brain forms over 1,000 trillion neural connections—a staggering feat of biological architecture that occurs primarily through relational interactions (Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000). Each time a caregiver responds to an infant's cry with comfort, each moment of eye contact, each soothing touch, each attuned vocalization shapes the architecture of the developing brain.
Right Hemisphere Vulnerability and Affect Regulation
During the first two years of life, the right hemisphere of the brain, which processes emotional and social information, is especially active and vulnerable to environmental influences (Schore, 2019). This hemisphere, often referred to as the "emotional brain," serves as the primary center for processing nonverbal communication, emotional attunement, and social connection. Unlike the left hemisphere, which develops later and focuses on language and logical thinking, the right hemisphere begins forming crucial neural networks from birth through relational experiences.
Research using neuroimaging reveals that during positive interactions between caregivers and infants, both brains exhibit synchronized patterns of activation, particularly in right-hemisphere regions involved in emotional processing and social cognition (Atzil et al., 2011). This neural synchrony represents the biological foundation of empathy and emotional attunement—the caregiver's regulated brain helps organize the infant's developing emotional circuitry.
When Caregiving Fails: The Birth of Relational Hunger
However, when caregivers are emotionally absent, inconsistently available, or overwhelmed by their unresolved trauma, the infant's developing nervous system adapts to these conditions in ways that can establish lasting patterns of relational hunger (van der Kolk, 2014). The infant's brain, designed to expect consistent emotional responsiveness, must reorganize itself to survive in an environment where such responsiveness is unpredictable or absent.
Research by Tronick and Weinberg (1997) using the "still-face" paradigm demonstrates how infants react to relational disconnection. When caregivers become emotionally unavailable even briefly, infants show immediate distress, increased stress hormone production, and attempts to re-engage. When this pattern becomes chronic, infants develop what researchers term "learned helplessness" regarding their ability to elicit care, leading to either hypervigilant seeking behaviors or withdrawal and dissociation.
Developmental Trauma and Arrested Development
Peter Levine's groundbreaking work on developmental trauma helps us understand how these early adaptations become embedded in the nervous system as lasting patterns (Levine, 2010). When an infant's fundamental need for connection is consistently unmet, the nervous system remains in a state of chronic activation, continually searching for the missing connection while simultaneously protecting against the disappointment of unmet needs.
This creates what Levine describes as "arrested development"—a condition in which the nervous system remains organized around the early trauma of unmet relational needs, thereby preventing normal developmental progression. The person may grow physically and intellectually while their emotional and relational capacities remain frozen at the developmental stage where the trauma occurred.
Levine's research reveals that unlike single-incident traumas, developmental trauma creates pervasive changes in how the nervous system functions, affecting everything from stress response to social engagement to self-regulation. The nervous system becomes what he calls "trauma-organized," meaning that survival and protection take precedence over growth, exploration, and connection.
The Neurobiology of Relational Hunger
Stephen Porges' Polyvagal Theory offers essential insights into the neurobiological roots of relational hunger, providing a roadmap for understanding how early relational experiences shape our capacity for connection throughout life (Porges, 2011). According to polyvagal theory, our autonomic nervous system has evolved in three stages, each serving different survival functions and significantly impacting our relational capacity.
The Social Engagement System: Our Mammalian Gift
The most recent evolutionary development is what Porges calls the "social engagement system," regulated by the ventral vagal complex—a branch of the vagus nerve that enables us to feel safe around others, express nuanced facial and vocal communication, and experience the calm and connection that come from secure attachment. This system represents our uniquely mammalian capacity for co-regulation, allowing us to regulate each other's nervous systems through social interaction literally.
When the social engagement system is functioning optimally, we can accurately read facial expressions, modulate our voice to convey warmth and safety, maintain appropriate eye contact, and feel genuinely relaxed and open in the presence of others. Research indicates that activation of the ventral vagal system is linked to feelings of safety, curiosity, playfulness, and the capacity for intimate connection (Dana, 2018).
However, the social engagement system only functions when the nervous system perceives safety—what Porges calls "neuroception," the unconscious detection of safety or threat in our environment. This neuroception occurs below conscious awareness but has a powerful influence on whether we can access our capacity for social connection or automatically shift into defensive states.
When Safety is Absent: Defensive Adaptations
When infants experience emotional neglect, inconsistent caregiving, or trauma, their social engagement system becomes impaired, and they begin to rely on older evolutionary defense mechanisms. The nervous system, designed to prioritize survival above all else, shifts into what Porges describes as sympathetic activation (fight-or-flight) or dorsal vagal activation (freeze-and-dissociate response).
A person whose nervous system has learned to operate primarily from defensive states may experience relationships as both alluring and threatening. They might feel powerfully attracted to connection (the social engagement system still seeking what it needs) while also feeling triggered into fight-or-flight or freeze responses when relationships become intimate (the defensive systems protecting against perceived danger).
This creates the characteristic push-pull dynamic often seen in individuals with relational hunger—simultaneously craving and avoiding the very connection they need most. Their nervous system, calibrated to early experiences of relational threat, interprets intimacy as danger, automatically triggering defensive responses even when the current relationship is safe.
The Body Keeps the Score: Embodied Memory of Relational Trauma
Bessel van der Kolk's revolutionary research on trauma and the body reveals how early relationship experiences become stored not only in the nervous system but throughout the entire body, creating what he describes as "the body that says no" to connection even when the mind consciously desires it (van der Kolk, 2014). This embodied dimension of relational hunger helps explain why cognitive approaches to healing attachment wounds often feel insufficient—the body holds memories and patterns that exist below conscious awareness.
Unlike explicit memories, which can be consciously recalled and described, the trauma of early relational wounds is often stored as an implicit memory—patterns of sensation, emotion, and physiological response that lack narrative context but powerfully influence the present-moment experience (Siegel, 2012). The body retains not only memories of trauma but also the absence of positive experiences—what researchers call "developmental deficits" rather than explicit injuries (Ogden et al., 2006).
This embodied memory of relational disappointment or danger can manifest as physical sensations during intimate interactions, such as sudden nausea when receiving genuine care, muscle tension when being held, breathing difficulties during emotional conversations, or inexplicable fatigue after positive social interactions. The body, conditioned by early experiences, continues to react to intimacy as if it were dangerous, even when the mind recognizes it as safe.
The Hungry Ghost Phenomenon: When Connection Cannot Be Internalized
Gabor Maté (2019) describes this phenomenon as a "hungry ghost" syndrome, drawing from Buddhist psychology to illustrate how unmet early developmental needs create an insatiable longing that cannot be satisfied through external means alone. In Buddhist cosmology, hungry ghosts (pretas) are depicted as beings with enormous stomachs representing vast appetites, but necks so thin they cannot swallow enough to satisfy their hunger. This powerful metaphor captures the essence of relational hunger: like the hungry ghost with an enormous appetite but a tiny mouth, individuals with relational hunger possess an immense need for connection but lack the developmental capacity to receive and internalize the nourishment they seek.
This metaphor illuminates a crucial paradox in relational hunger that distinguishes it from other psychological needs. The problem is not simply the absence of caring relationships in the present moment, but rather a fundamental impairment in the capacity to metabolize relational nourishment when it is offered. Just as the hungry ghost's constricted throat prevents adequate nutrition despite an abundance of food, individuals with relational hunger often possess learned patterns that filter out or minimize positive relational experiences.
The Neurobiological Basis of Impaired Internalization
Research in developmental neuroscience reveals that the capacity to internalize positive experiences—what neuroscientist Rick Hanson (2013) refers to as "taking in the good"—depends on neural pathways that develop through early, secure attachment experiences. When infants receive consistent attunement and soothing from caregivers, their brains wire for the capacity to self-soothe and internalize feelings of safety and connection (Schore, 2003).
However, when these early experiences are characterized by neglect, inconsistency, or trauma, the developing brain adapts by prioritizing threat detection over connection-seeking. This neurobiological adaptation serves as a survival mechanism in dangerous environments. However, it creates the "thin neck" of the hungry ghost—an inability to take in and metabolize the very experiences the person most desperately needs.
Studies using neuroimaging show that individuals with histories of early trauma demonstrate altered neural responses to positive social stimuli, suggesting a diminished capacity to experience pleasure from positive social interactions (Dannlowski et al., 2012). This neurobiological finding provides scientific validation for the hungry ghost metaphor—the brain becomes less capable of "digesting" positive relational experiences.
The Hedonic Treadmill and External Solutions
This metaphor aligns powerfully with research on hedonic adaptation, which demonstrates that external achievements and acquisitions provide only temporary satisfaction before returning to baseline levels of well-being (Brickman & Campbell, 1971). However, the hungry ghost syndrome represents a more severe manifestation where external achievements not only fail to provide lasting satisfaction but may reinforce the underlying sense of emptiness.
The hungry ghost represents the futile attempt to fill an internal void through external means—whether through relationships, achievements, substances, or other pursuits—without addressing the underlying developmental trauma. Each external solution provides momentary relief but fails to satisfy the deeper need for authentic, attuned connection.
Manifestations of the Hungry Ghost Pattern
Relational Hungry Ghosts may engage in hyperactivating strategies—frantically pursuing multiple relationships, seeking constant reassurance, or engaging in dramatic behaviors to elicit attention and care. However, when care is offered, their developmental wounds prevent them from fully receiving it. They may interpret kindness as pity, dismiss compliments as insincere, or unconsciously sabotage relationships just as they begin to deepen.
Achievement-Oriented Hungry Ghosts may pursue external validation through career success, academic achievements, or public recognition. Research on impostor syndrome reveals that many high achievers experience persistent feelings of fraudulence despite objective evidence of their competence (Clance & Imes, 1978), reflecting the "hungry ghost" pattern where external achievements temporarily quiet the inner void, but the underlying wound remains unhealed.
Substance-Related Hungry Ghosts may use alcohol, drugs, food, or other substances to fill the relational void. Maté's work with addiction demonstrates that substance use often represents an attempt to self-medicate the pain of early relational trauma (Maté, 2008). However, substances provide only chemical approximations of the neurochemical states that should have been established through secure early relationships.
Maladaptive Strategies and Attachment Patterns: The Protective Prison of Relational Hunger
Individuals experiencing relational hunger often employ various unconscious strategies in their attempts to meet these needs, creating what attachment researchers describe as "organized insecurity"—predictable patterns of behavior designed to maximize connection while minimizing the risk of further relational injury (Main & Solomon, 1986). These strategies emerge from the child's brilliant adaptation to caregiving environments that were inconsistent, overwhelming, or emotionally unavailable. However, what serves as psychological survival in childhood often becomes a relational prison in adulthood.
Anxious Attachment: The Pursuit of Reassurance
Anxious attachment, characterized by seeking constant reassurance and persistent fear of abandonment, develops when caregivers are inconsistently responsive—sometimes available and nurturing, other times overwhelmed, distracted, or emotionally absent. Adults with anxious attachment exhibit excessive reassurance seeking, repeatedly asking partners questions like "Do you still love me?" or "Are you mad at me?" even when no evidence suggests relationship problems (Joiner et al., 1999).
Neurobiological research reveals that individuals with anxious attachment show heightened activation in the amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex when viewing images of relationship threat, suggesting their brains are literally wired to detect and respond to signs of potential abandonment (Gillath et al., 2005). This hypervigilant scanning for threat creates "rejection sensitivity"—the tendency to anxiously expect, readily perceive, and intensely react to rejection even in ambiguous social situations (Downey & Feldman, 1996).
Avoidant Attachment: The Fortress of Self-Reliance
Avoidant attachment, marked by emotional distancing and compulsive self-reliance, develops in response to caregivers who are consistently rejecting, critical, or emotionally unavailable. Adults with avoidant attachment often present as highly competent and self-sufficient, but this independence comes at the cost of genuine intimacy. They may intellectualize emotions rather than feel them, maintain physical or emotional distance in relationships, or unconsciously select emotionally unavailable partners.
Neuroimaging studies reveal that individuals with avoidant attachment patterns exhibit reduced activation in brain regions associated with emotional processing and empathy when viewing emotional stimuli, suggesting they have developed neurobiological strategies for dampening emotional responses (Vrtička et al., 2008). This emotional numbing serves as protection against the pain of rejection but also prevents them from experiencing the full rewards of intimate connection.
Disorganized Attachment: The Impossible Paradox of Fear and Love
Perhaps the most complex and devastating pattern is disorganized attachment, which develops when caregivers become simultaneously sources of comfort and terror—creating what attachment researchers describe as "fright without solution" (Main & Hesse, 1990). Children experiencing disorganized attachment face what researchers refer to as an "unsolvable paradox," which violates the most basic assumptions of mammalian survival (Lyons-Ruth & Jacobvitz, 2008). Their biological attachment system directs them toward the very person who causes them harm.
The impact on the developing brain is profound and lasting. When the attachment system and the fear system are simultaneously activated with no resolution, the child's nervous system becomes chronically dysregulated. Research by van der Kolk (2005) shows that this chronic activation leads to fragmentation in brain development, particularly affecting the integration between the emotional brain (limbic system) and the thinking brain (prefrontal cortex).
Adults with disorganized attachment histories often exhibit behavior that appears intentionally contradictory, reflecting the early fragmentation of their attachment experiences. They may desperately seek intimacy, pursuing relationships with intense passion and declared devotion, only to suddenly sabotage these connections just as they begin to deepen. These individuals frequently experience "emotional flashbacks"—sudden, overwhelming emotional states that transport them back to childhood terror without the conscious awareness that they are reliving past experiences (Walker, 2013).
The Paradox of Self-Sabotage: Destroying What We Most Desire
Perhaps most tragically, individuals with relational hunger often push away the very connections they desperately seek through unconscious self-sabotage. This phenomenon represents one of the most heartbreaking and perplexing aspects of attachment wounds. This paradoxical behavior serves several crucial psychological functions, which, although ultimately destructive, provide short-term emotional relief and a sense of psychological control.
Preemptive Rejection and the Illusion of Control
Self-sabotage serves what psychologists call "preemptive rejection"—the unconscious strategy of ending relationships before experiencing the anticipated abandonment (Baumeister & Scher, 1988). This behavior follows an internal logic: "If I leave first, I cannot be left; if I reject first, I cannot be rejected." Research on attachment anxiety reveals that individuals with histories of inconsistent caregiving develop "abandonment schemas"—deeply held beliefs that relationships inevitably end in rejection and loss (Young et al., 2003).
Self-sabotage provides what trauma therapist Pete Walker (2013) describes as the "illusion of agency"—the feeling that one is actively choosing their fate rather than passively waiting for inevitable harm. This sense of control, however false, can feel psychologically preferable to the helpless terror of potential abandonment.
Manifestations of Self-Sabotage
Self-sabotage may manifest as picking fights during moments of closeness, having affairs when relationships deepen, or finding "fatal flaws" in partners who offer genuine love. Research shows that infidelity often occurs not when relationships are failing, but when they are succeeding—particularly for individuals with attachment fears (Allen et al., 2005). The affair serves as a "relationship exit strategy," providing a guaranteed way to end a relationship that has become too emotionally threatening.
Perhaps most subtly destructive is the tendency to find "fatal flaws" in partners who offer genuine love—flaws that justify ending otherwise healthy relationships. This process often involves "fatal flaw amplification"—taking minor issues and inflating them into relationship-ending problems through all-or-nothing thinking.
The Neurobiological Basis of Self-Sabotage
Contemporary neuroscience reveals that self-sabotage is associated with specific brain circuits that have developed through early attachment experiences. When the attachment system and the fear system become associated through early trauma or neglect, the brain literally learns to perceive love as danger (Cozolino, 2014). Neuroimaging studies show that individuals with insecure attachment demonstrate increased amygdala activation when viewing images of intimate couples, suggesting that their brains interpret closeness as a threat requiring defensive response (Gillath et al., 2005).
The Pathway to Healing: Earned Security
Despite the persistent nature of early relational wounds, the concept of "earned security" from attachment research provides hope, demonstrating that individuals can develop secure attachment patterns later in life through corrective relational experiences (Roisman et al., 2002). However, this process requires specific qualities in relationships that directly address the original developmental deficits.
Studies on therapeutic alliance show that healing occurs through consistent, attuned relationships where individuals experience being genuinely understood, accepted, and valued for their authentic selves (Bordin, 1979; Horvath & Symonds, 1991). These corrective experiences must provide what was missing in early development: consistent emotional attunement, reliable availability, authentic presence, and the profound experience of being truly seen and understood.
Neuroplasticity and the Capacity for Change
Research on neuroplasticity reveals that the brain retains the capacity for change throughout life, offering hope for individuals trapped in patterns of relational hunger (Doidge, 2007). However, this change requires specific types of experiences that mirror the attuned, regulating relationships that should have occurred in early development. This is why therapeutic relationships characterized by consistent availability, authentic presence, and emotional attunement can gradually help individuals develop the capacity to "take in the good" that was disrupted in early development.
Contemporary research on social baseline theory further validates the biological imperative for close relationships, showing that the presence of trusted others literally regulates our nervous system, reducing the metabolic cost of emotional and physiological regulation (Beckes & Coan, 2011). This research demonstrates that humans are not designed to navigate life's challenges in isolation but require the co-regulatory presence of attuned others for optimal functioning.
Therapeutic Approaches for Healing Relational Hunger
Understanding relational hunger as both a psychological and neurobiological phenomenon has significant implications for healing approaches. Traditional therapy that focuses solely on cognitive insight or behavioral change may provide temporary relief but often fails to address the underlying capacity deficits. Instead, healing requires what trauma specialists call "bottom-up" approaches that help rebuild the neurobiological foundations for connection and self-regulation (van der Kolk, 2014).
Body-Based Approaches
The integration of body-based therapies acknowledges that relational trauma is stored not just in the mind but throughout the entire nervous system. Approaches such as somatic experiencing, sensorimotor psychotherapy, yoga therapy, and other embodied practices can help individuals gradually expand their "window of tolerance"—their capacity to remain present and regulated during relational interactions rather than automatically shifting into defensive states (Ogden et al., 2006).
Attachment-Informed Therapy
Attachment-informed therapeutic approaches emphasize the importance of the therapeutic relationship itself as a vehicle for healing. The therapist's consistent availability, emotional attunement, and authentic presence provide corrective experiences that can gradually challenge insecure internal working models and foster the development of new neural pathways for secure connection.
Trauma-Informed Care
Understanding that relational hunger often stems from developmental trauma, trauma-informed approaches emphasize safety, trustworthiness, collaboration, and choice in the therapeutic process. These approaches recognize that healing happens through the body and nervous system, not just through cognitive understanding.
Clinical Implications and Treatment Considerations
The comprehensive understanding of relational hunger presented in this article has significant implications for clinical practice. Mental health professionals working with individuals experiencing persistent loneliness, relationship difficulties, or emotional emptiness should consider the possibility that underlying relational hunger may stem from early developmental experiences.
Assessment and Diagnosis
Assessment should include careful attention to early attachment relationships, developmental trauma, and current patterns of connection and disconnection. Tools such as the Adult Attachment Interview, the Adverse Childhood Experiences questionnaire, and body-based assessments can provide valuable information about the origins and manifestations of relational hunger.
Treatment Planning
Treatment planning should address both the psychological and somatic dimensions of relational hunger. This may include individual therapy focused on attachment repair, group therapy that provides corrective relational experiences, body-based interventions that address nervous system dysregulation, and family or couples therapy that can create healing relationships in current life contexts.
Therapeutic Relationship as Medicine
Perhaps most importantly, the therapeutic relationship itself becomes a primary vehicle for healing and addressing relational hunger. The therapist's capacity to provide consistent attunement, authentic presence, and genuine care can help clients gradually develop the internal resources for secure connection that may have been lacking in early development.
Societal Implications and Prevention
Understanding relational hunger has broader implications for society's approach to mental health, education, and community building. Recognition that humans have fundamental needs for authentic connection suggests the importance of creating social structures and institutions that support healthy relationship development from the earliest stages of life.
Early Intervention and Prevention
Programs that support healthy attachment relationships between caregivers and infants, such as home visiting programs, parent education initiatives, and mental health services for new parents, can help prevent the development of relational hunger. Early intervention services that identify and address attachment difficulties in young children can also reduce the likelihood of persistent relational difficulties in adulthood.
Community and Social Policy
Creating communities that prioritize authentic connection over productivity and achievement may help address the epidemic of loneliness and relational hunger in modern society. This includes implementing workplace policies that support work-life balance, adopting educational approaches that emphasize social-emotional learning, and developing community programs that foster meaningful relationships across generations.
Future Research Directions
While significant progress has been made in understanding relational hunger, several areas warrant further investigation:
- Longitudinal Studies: Long-term studies following individuals from infancy through adulthood could provide more detailed understanding of how early relational experiences influence lifelong patterns of connection and disconnection.
- Neurobiological Research: Advanced neuroimaging techniques could further illuminate the brain mechanisms involved in relational hunger and how they change through healing interventions.
- Treatment Outcome Studies: Rigorous research on the effectiveness of different therapeutic approaches for healing relational hunger could help identify the most effective interventions.
- Cross-Cultural Research: Investigation of how relational hunger manifests across different cultural contexts could provide insights into universal versus culture-specific aspects of this phenomenon.
- Intergenerational Transmission: Research on how patterns of relational hunger are transmitted across generations could inform prevention and intervention strategies.
Conclusion
Relational hunger represents one of the most fundamental aspects of human psychology—a deep longing for authentic connection that emerges when our earliest needs for attunement, availability, authentic presence, and genuine recognition remain unmet during critical developmental periods. This comprehensive review has demonstrated that relational hunger is not merely a psychological phenomenon, but rather involves complex interactions between nervous system development, embodied memory, and attachment patterns that persist throughout the lifespan.
The research synthesized in this article reveals several crucial insights:
First, relational hunger has clear neurobiological foundations. Early relational experiences literally shape the architecture of the developing brain, with secure attachment fostering neural pathways that support emotional regulation, social connection, and the capacity to internalize positive experiences. Conversely, early relational trauma or neglect creates lasting changes in nervous system functioning that can manifest as chronic patterns of relational difficulty.
Second, the manifestations of relational hunger in adulthood reflect sophisticated adaptive strategies that once served crucial survival functions but often become barriers to the very connections individuals most desperately need. Understanding behaviors such as anxious seeking, avoidant distancing, and self-sabotage as protective adaptations rather than character flaws opens possibilities for compassionate and effective intervention.
Third, healing relational hunger requires approaches that address both the psychological and somatic dimensions of early relational wounds. The integration of attachment-informed therapy, trauma-sensitive approaches, and body-based interventions acknowledges that healing happens through corrective relational experiences that can rewire neural pathways developed in early life.
Fourth, the concept of "earned security" offers hope that individuals can develop secure attachment patterns later in life through consistent, attuned relationships that provide the developmental experiences missing in early life. The brain's capacity for neuroplasticity throughout the lifespan means that it is never too late to heal relational wounds and develop the capacity for authentic connection.
Fifth, the hungry ghost metaphor illuminates why external solutions—whether through achievements, substances, or even multiple relationships—cannot satisfy relational hunger. The problem is not simply the absence of caring relationships but rather an impaired capacity to internalize and metabolize the nourishment that connection can provide. Healing requires developing this capacity through specific types of relational experiences that can gradually teach the nervous system that intimacy can be a safe and secure experience.
Implications for Practice
For mental health professionals, this understanding of relational hunger suggests the importance of:
- Conducting thorough assessments that include early attachment relationships and developmental trauma
- Utilizing the therapeutic relationship itself as a primary vehicle for healing
- Integrating body-based approaches that address nervous system dysregulation
- Understanding apparently destructive behaviors as adaptive strategies that require compassion rather than confrontation
- Recognizing that healing happens through experience rather than insight alone.
Societal Considerations
At a societal level, understanding relational hunger underscores the crucial importance of fostering healthy attachment relationships from the earliest stages of life. This includes:
- Investing in programs that support new parents and healthy infant-caregiver relationships
- Creating educational and workplace environments that prioritize authentic connection alongside achievement
- Developing community structures that foster meaningful relationships across generations
- Addressing the epidemic of loneliness not through technological solutions but through initiatives that support genuine human connection
The Path Forward
The research presented in this article suggests that relational hunger, while often deeply painful and persistent, is ultimately a testament to the fundamental human need for connection. Rather than viewing it as pathology, we can understand it as the psyche's continued reaching toward the authentic connection that represents our birthright as social beings.
The journey from relational hunger to earned security is not a quick or straightforward process. It requires patience, compassion, and the gradual development of tolerance for the vulnerability that authentic intimacy demands. However, the research on neuroplasticity and attachment provides compelling evidence that change is possible throughout the lifespan.
Perhaps most importantly, understanding relational hunger can help us recognize that the epidemic of loneliness and disconnection in modern society is not an inevitable consequence. By understanding how authentic connection develops and what happens when it is absent, we can create conditions that support the fundamental human need for belonging that underlies all healthy development.
The hungry ghost need not remain forever hungry. Through relationships characterized by consistent attunement, authentic presence, and genuine care, the constricted throat can gradually open, allowing the nourishment of connection to reach the heart that yearns for it. In this way, the wounds of early relational trauma can become doorways to more profound compassion, both for ourselves and for others who share this most fundamental of human needs.
The path from relational hunger to authentic connection represents not just individual healing but the possibility of creating a more connected and compassionate world—one relationship at a time.
References
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Allen, E. S., Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., Snyder, D. K., Gordon, K. C., & Glass, S. P. (2005). Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and contextual factors in engaging in and responding to extramarital involvement. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12(2), 101-130.
Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. Jossey-Bass.
Atzil, S., Hendler, T., & Feldman, R. (2011). Specifying the neurobiological basis of human attachment: Brain, hormones, and behavior in synchronous and intrusive mothers. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36(13), 2603-2615.
Ayduk, O., Downey, G., Testa, A., Yen, Y., & Shoda, Y. (2003). Does rejection elicit hostility in rejection sensitive women? Social Cognition, 21(4), 245-271.
Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 461-484.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. MIT Press.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226-244.
Baumeister, R. F., & Scher, S. J. (1988). Self-defeating behavior patterns among normal individuals: Review and analysis of common self-destructive tendencies. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 3-22.
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press.
Beckes, L., & Coan, J. A. (2011). Social baseline theory: The role of social proximity in emotion and economy of action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(12), 976-988.
Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16(3), 252-260.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. Basic Books.
Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 3-33.
Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory (pp. 287-305). Academic Press.
Brown, B. (2006). Shame resilience theory: A grounded theory study on women and shame. Families in Society, 87(1), 43-52.
Brown, B. (2010). The gifts of imperfection: Let go of who you think you're supposed to be and embrace who you are. Hazelden Publishing.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C. (2009). Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 447-454.
Cacioppo, J., & Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. W. W. Norton & Company.
Cassidy, J., & Kobak, R. R. (1988). Avoidance and its relation to other defensive processes. In J. Belsky & T. Nezworski (Eds.), Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 300-323). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Champagne, F. A. (2008). Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 29(3), 386-397.
Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241-247.
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644-663.
Cozolino, L. (2014). The neuroscience of human relationships: Attachment and the developing social brain. W. W. Norton.
Dana, D. (2018). The polyvagal theory in therapy: Engaging the rhythm of regulation. W. W. Norton.
Dannlowski, U., Stuhrmann, A., Beutelmann, V., Zwanzger, P., Lenzen, T., Grotegerd, D., ... & Kugel, H. (2012). Limbic scars: Long-term consequences of childhood maltreatment revealed by functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging. Biological Psychiatry, 71(4), 286-293.
Dichter, G. S., Smoski, M. J., Kampov‐Polevoy, A. B., Gallop, R., & Garbutt, J. C. (2010). Unipolar depression does not moderate responses to the Sweet Taste Test. Depression and Anxiety, 27(9), 859-863.
Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. Viking.
Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1327-1343.
Downey, G., Freitas, A. L., Michaelis, B., & Khouri, H. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 545-560.
Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290-292.
Elliot, A. J. (2008). Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation. Psychology Press.
Feldman, R. (2012). Bio-behavioral synchrony: A model for integrating biological and microsocial behavioral processes in the study of parenting. Parenting, 12(2-3), 154-164.
Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., & Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245-258.
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. Other Press.
Fraley, R. C., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2007). Adult attachment and preemptive defenses: Converging evidence on the role of defensive exclusion at the level of encoding. Journal of Personality, 75(5), 1033-1050.
Fraley, R. C., Davis, K. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Attachment and commitment: Do they predict relationship outcomes? In W. Ickes & S. Duck (Eds.), The social psychology of personal relationships (pp. 109-124). John Wiley & Sons.
Gillath, O., Bunge, S. A., Shaver, P. R., Wendelken, C., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment-style differences in the ability to suppress negative thoughts: Exploring the neural correlates. NeuroImage, 28(4), 835-847.
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce?: The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gunderson, J. G. (2001). Borderline personality disorder: A clinical guide. American Psychiatric Publishing.
Gunnar, M., & Quevedo, K. (2007). The neurobiology of stress and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 145-173.
Haber, M. G., Cohen, J. L., Lucas, T., & Baltes, B. B. (2007). The relationship between self-reported received and perceived social support: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39(1-2), 133-144.
Hanson, R. (2013). Hardwiring happiness: The new brain science of contentment, calm, and confidence. Harmony Books.
Hensch, T. K. (2004). Critical period regulation. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 549-579.
Hesse, E. (2008). The Adult Attachment Interview: Protocol, method of analysis, and empirical studies. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 552-598). Guilford Press.
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316.
Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(2), 139-149.
Johnson, M. H. (2005). Subcortical face processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(10), 766-774.
Joiner, T. E., Metalsky, G. I., Katz, J., & Beach, S. R. (1999). Depression and excessive reassurance-seeking. Psychological Inquiry, 10(4), 269-278.
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 410-422.
Kernberg, O. F. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. Jason Aronson.
Krystal, H. (1988). Integration and self-healing: Affect, trauma, alexithymia. Analytic Press.
Levine, P. A. (2010). In an unspoken voice: How the body releases trauma and restores goodness. North Atlantic Books.
Lyons-Ruth, K., & Jacobvitz, D. (2008). Attachment disorganization: Genetic factors, parenting contexts, and developmental transformation from infancy to adulthood. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 666-697). Guilford Press.
Main, M., & Hesse, E. (1990). Parents' unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status: Is frightened and/or frightening parental behavior the linking mechanism? In M. T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 161-182). University of Chicago Press.
Main, M., Hesse, E., & Hesse, S. (2005). Attachment theory and research: Overview with suggested applications to child custody. Family Court Review, 43(3), 426-463.
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1-2), 66-104.
Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1986). Discovery of an insecure-disorganized/disoriented attachment pattern. In T. B. Brazelton & M. W. Yogman (Eds.), Affective development in infancy (pp. 95-124). Ablex.
Maté, G. (2008). In the realm of hungry ghosts: Close encounters with addiction. Knopf Canada.
Maté, G. (2019). In the realm of hungry ghosts: Close encounters with addiction. Vermilion.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.
Miller, A. (1981). The drama of the gifted child. Basic Books.
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220.
Ogden, P., Minton, K., & Pain, C. (2006). Trauma and the body: A sensorimotor approach to psychotherapy. W. W. Norton.
Perry, B. D. (2006). Applying principles of neurodevelopment to clinical work with maltreated and traumatized children: The neurosequential model of therapeutics. In N. B. Webb (Ed.), Working with traumatized youth in child welfare (pp. 27-52). Guilford Press.
Perry, B. D. (2009). Examining child maltreatment through a neurodevelopmental lens: Clinical applications of the neurosequential model of therapeutics. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 14(4), 240-255.
Perry, B. D., & Szalavitz, M. (2017). The boy who was raised as a dog: And other stories from a child psychiatrist's notebook. Basic Books.
Porges, S. W. (2004). Neuroception: A subconscious system for detecting threats and safety. Zero to Three, 24(5), 19-24.
Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. W. W. Norton.
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
Roisman, G. I., Padrón, E., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2002). Earned–secure attachment status in retrospect and prospect. Child Development, 73(4), 1204-1219.
Schore, A. N. (2003). Affect dysregulation and disorders of the self. W. W. Norton.
Schore, A. N. (2019). Right brain psychotherapy. W. W. Norton.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1972). Learned helplessness: Annual review of medicine. Annual Reviews.
Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. National Academy Press.
Siegel, D. J. (2012). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. Guilford Press.
Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E. A., & Collins, W. A. (2005). The development of the person: The Minnesota study of risk and adaptation from birth to adulthood. Guilford Press.
Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. Basic Books.
Strathearn, L., Fonagy, P., Amico, J., & Montague, P. R. (2009). Adult attachment predicts maternal brain and oxytocin response to infant cues. Neuropsychopharmacology, 34(13), 2655-2666.
Teicher, M. H., Andersen, S. L., Polcari, A., Anderson, C. M., Navalta, C. P., & Kim, D. M. (2003). The neurobiological consequences of early stress and childhood maltreatment. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 27(1-2), 33-44.
Tronick, E. (2007). The neurobehavioral and social-emotional development of infants and children. W. W. Norton.
Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978). The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17(1), 1-13.
Tronick, E. Z., & Weinberg, M. K. (1997). Depressed mothers and infants: Failure to form dyadic states of consciousness. In L. Murray & P. J. Cooper (Eds.), Postpartum depression and child development (pp. 54-81). Guilford Press.
Van der Hart, O., Nijenhuis, E. R., & Steele, K. (2006). The haunted self: Structural dissociation and the treatment of chronic traumatization. W. W. Norton.
van der Kolk, B. A. (2005). Developmental trauma disorder: Toward a rational diagnosis for children with complex trauma histories. Psychiatric Annals, 35(5), 401-408.
van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.
Vrtička, P., Andersson, F., Grandjean, D., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2008). Individual attachment style modulates human amygdala and striatum activation during social appraisal. PLoS One, 3(8), e2868.
Walker, P. (2013). Complex PTSD: From surviving to thriving. CreateSpace Independent Publishing.
Winnicott, D. W. (1960). Ego distortion in terms of true and false self. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 140-152). International Universities Press.
Woods, S. C., Schwartz, M. W., Baskin, D. G., & Seeley, R. J. (1998). Food intake and the regulation of body weight. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 255-277.
Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide. Guilford Press.
Legg til kommentar
Kommentarer